Science and God: Mutually Exclusive?

A sensuous person is one who is ruled by their senses. Because this term has a negative connotation, however, modern thought substitutes “sensuality” to “empirical science.” This is merely a mask for the rulership of the senses–complete reliance upon that which can be seen, felt, tasted, heard, and smelled to whatever degree of scientific “repeatability” you desire. And yet, it is largely believed that if something is not observable, then it does not exist. This was true of cells, molecules, and atoms at one time. Did they suddenly exist when we sensed them? How about dark matter (the majority of the universe)–did it, too, suddenly exist when formulas necessitated it? How about the supernatural?

If a claim exists beyond the bounds of the senses, one cannot use the lack of senses to refute the claim–only to become skeptical. However, the claim can be rejected if the senses prove otherwise–just as the senses can serve as inductive evidence that the claim stands.

If there is such an intersection between the natural and supernatural, a true scientist ought to ask questions (second step of the scientific method) of the supernatural claim to determine if it is supported by the natural world. If the claim fails the test of coherence among the categories of origin, meaning, morality, or destiny, or if natural observation definitively negates the claim, then the scientist can rightly deem the claim as false. Short of this thorough investigation, however, no valid conclusion may be reached.

Philosophical science today (that’s what I call a scientist who steps outside the bounds of his or her trade) desperately attempts to prove there is no God because science can describe new things. Admittedly, theists have argued, insubstantially, that God must be the missing piece when something is unknown (God particles and the like). It’s not that God is the missing piece of our understanding as much as He is the cause and controller of everything. Science merely observes. It connects. It attempts to explain. It does not create. It controls precious little. Science may, ironically, be God’s biggest indictment against atheists and agnostics because of the sheer volume of its witness to and interaction with the created order.

The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

–Romans 1:18-20

 

So I tell you this, and insist on it in the Lord, that you must no longer live as the Gentiles do, in the futility of their thinking. They are darkened in their understanding and separated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them due to the hardening of their hearts. Having lost all sensitivity, they have given themselves over to sensuality so as to indulge in every kind of impurity, and they are full of greed.

That, however, is not the way of life you learned when you heard about Christ and were taught in him in accordance with the truth that is in Jesus. You were taught, with regard to your former way of life, to put off your old self, which is being corrupted by its deceitful desires; to be made new in the attitude of your minds; and to put on the new self, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness.

–Ephesians 4:17-23

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *